Introduction
Ionizing radiation sources may be found in a wide range of occupational settings, including health care facilities, research institutions, nuclear reactors and their support facilities, nuclear weapon production facilities, and other various manufacturing settings, just to name a few. These radiation sources can pose a considerable health risk to affected workers if not properly controlled. This page provides a starting point for technical and regulatory information regarding the recognition, evaluation, and control of occupational health hazards associated with ionizing radiation
The role and work of the radiologic technologist has continued to evolve since the occupation was created over 100 years ago. The title technician was first used in the early 1900s, due to uneducated and unskilled personnel using trial and error methods to operate unrefined equipment. The title technologist is now used to reflect the education and knowledge required to work safely in the field of diagnostic radiology. A large portion of every qualified technologist’s training is the subject of radiation protection. One of the first things taught in radiologic technology programs is the cardinal principles of radiation protection. Every student technologist knows that time, distance, and shielding is very important to them and the patients they serve. Sadly, as time progresses in some technologists’ careers, they tend to forget the importance of some of the basic, yet essential radiation safety practices they once learned. It is common place to see technologists holding patients during procedures, a practice clearly taught against in radiologic technology education programs and in medical literature. Also, technologists may sometimes be seen in procedure rooms during exposures without even wearing a lead apron. New imaging technologies now make overexposing the patient the quickest way to complete a procedure. Clearly, the field of diagnostic radiology is changing, putting pressure on technologists to produce quality images in very short periods of time, which can lead to technologists putting themselves or others in harm’s way. Administrators and managers need to be aware that this may occur if a facility is not staffed properly. Technologists, regardless of position, should continue to earn the title “technologist” by making sure the radiation dose to themselves and others stays as low as reasonably achievable.
The field of diagnostic radiology continues to grow in terms of number of procedures performed, types of imaging procedures or modalities used, and number of technologists working in the field. While the amount of radiation exposure to the technologist has decreased drastically in the last two decades, the amount of radiation exposure the patient receives in a given procedure has potentially increased. New technologies allow for patients to be overexposed routinely, and also allow for repeats to be taken quickly, making it easier for a technologist to multiply the patient’s dose without considering the implications. Since there is no safe dose of radiation, it is more important than ever to remember and practice the ALARA principle.
Chapter II
Health Effects from Exposure to Ionizing Radiation
Radiation Exposure
Any release of radioactive material is a potential source of radiation exposure to the population. In addition to exposure from external sources, radiation exposure can occur internally from ingesting, inhaling, injecting, or absorbing radioactive materials. Both external and internal sources may irradiate the whole body or a portion of the body.
The amount of radiation exposure is expressed in a unit called millirem (mrem). In the United States, the average person is exposed to an effective dose equivalent of approximatly 360 mrem (whole-body exposure) per year from all sources (NCRP
Report No. 93).
Results of Exposure
Radiation affects people by depositing energy in body tissue, which can cause cell damage or cell death. In some cases there may be no noticeable effect. In other cases, the cell may survive but become abnormal, either temporarily or permanently. Additionally, an abnormal cell may become malignant. Both large and small doses of radiation can cause cellular damage. The extent of the damage depends upon the total amount of energy absorbed, the time period and dose rate of the exposure, and the particular organs exposed.
By damaging the genetic material (DNA) contained in the body’s cells, radiation can cause cancer. Damage to genetic material in reproductive cells can cause genetic mutations that can be passed on to future generations. In rare occurrences where there is a large amount of radiation exposure, sickness or even death can occur in a limited amount of hours or days.
Chronic Exposure
Chronic exposure is continuous or intermittent exposure to low doses of radiation over a long period of time. With chronic exposure, there is a delay between the exposure and the observed health effect. These effects can include cancer and other health outcomes such as benign tumors, cataracts, and potentially harmful genetic effects.
Acute Exposure
Acute exposure is exposure to a large, single dose of radiation, or a series of moderate doses received during a short period of time. Large acute doses can result from accidental or emergency exposures or from specific medical procedures (radiation therapy). For approved medical exposures, the benefit of the procedure may outweigh the risk from exposure.
In most cases, a large acute exposure to radiation causes both immediate and delayed effects. Delayed biological effects can include cataracts, temporary or permanent sterility, cancer, and harmful genetic effects. For humans and other mammals, acute exposure to the whole body, if large enough, can cause rapid development of radiation sickness, evidenced by gastrointestinal disorders, bacterial infections, hemorrhaging, anemia, loss of body fluids, and electrolyte imbalance. Extremely high dose of acute radiation exposure can result in death within a few hours, days, or weeks.
Risks of Health Effects
All people receive chronic exposure to background levels of radiation present in the environment. Many people also receive additional chronic exposures and relatively small acute exposures. For populations receiving such exposures, the primary concern is that radiation could increase the risk of cancer or harmful genetic effects.
The probability of a radiation-induced cancer or harmful genetic effects is related to the total amount of radiation accumulated by an individual. Based on current scientific evidence, any exposure to radiation can be harmful (e.g., can increase the risk of cancer); however, at very low exposures, the estimated increases in risk are very small. For this reason, cancer rates in populations receiving very low doses of excess radiation (doses of radiation above background) may be similar to the rates for average populations.
Evidence of injury from low or moderate doses of radiation may not show up for months or even years. For example, the minimum time period between the radiation exposure and the appearance of leukemia (latency period) is 2 years. For solid tumors, the latency period is more than 5 years. The types of effects and their probability of occurrence can depend on whether the exposure was chronic or acute. It should be noted that all of the long-term health effects associated with exposure to radiation can also be caused by other factors.
Estimating Health Risk
The most complete data available to scientists are on the survivors of the atomic bomb explosions in Japan, on radiation industry workers, and on people receiving large doses of medical radiation. These data demonstrate a higher incidence of cancer among exposed individuals and a greater probability of cancer as the level of exposure increases. In the absence of more direct information, the data also are used to estimate what the effects might be at lower exposures. Where questions arise, scientists try to come to conclusions based on information obtained from laboratory experiments, but these determinations are acknowledged to be uncertain. For radon, scientists largely depend on data collected on underground miners. Professionals in the radiation protection field prudently assume that the chance of a fatal cancer from radiation exposure increases in proportion to the magnitude of the exposure. In other words, it is assumed that no radiation exposure is completely risk free.
What Are the Health Effects of Ionizing Radiation?
Radiation may affect living things by affecting the cells that make up the living organism. Radiation effects on a cell are random. That is, the same type and amount of radiation could strike the same cell many times and have a different effect, including no effect, each time. However, in general, the more radiation that strikes the cell, the greater the chances of an effect occurring. If a significant number of cells are affected, the organism may be damaged or even die.
All living things are constantly exposed to background radiation. Most cells have the ability to repair some damage done by this level of radiation. As a result, the effects of doses similar to background levels are impossible to measure in a single individual. Effects of these low levels of radiation are often predicted for populations rather than for individuals.
This fact sheet describes how low levels of radiation affect cells, how cell damage affects the health of individuals, and how the health effects on populations are estimated. Effects of high levels of radiation will be discussed briefly.
Radiation Effects on a Cell
When a cell absorbs radiation, there are four possible effects on the cell. First, the cell may suffer enough damage to cause loss of proper function, and the cell will die. Second, the cell may lose its ability to reproduce. Third, the cell’s genetic code (i.e., the DNA) may be damaged such that future copies of the cell are altered, which may result in cancerous growth. Finally, the absorption of radiation by a cell may have no adverse effect.
Cells are made up of molecules. Cell damage may be caused by interaction of radiation with these molecules. If radiation strikes a molecule crucial to the cell’s function, such as DNA, damage to the cell is likely to be greater than if the radiation strikes a less crucial molecule such as water.
Some cells are more likely to be affected by radiation than others. Cells that multiply rapidly are the most susceptible. Cells can often repair radiation damage, but if the cell multiplies (splits into two identical cells) before it has had time to repair the most recent radiation damage, the new cells might not be accurate copies of the old one. Some examples of rapidly multiplying cells are those in a fetus and cancer cells.
Health Effects of Radiation
Health effects of radiation are divided into two categories: threshold effects and non-threshold effects. Threshold effects appear after a certain level of radiation exposure is reached and enough cells have been damaged to make the effect apparent. Non-threshold effects can occur at lower levels of radiation exposure.
Threshold effects occur when levels of radiation exposure are tens, hundreds, or thousands of times higher than background, and usually when the exposure is over a very short time, such as a few minutes. Some examples of observed threshold effects and the doses which cause them are presented in Table 1. Dose is measured in rem or millirem. (1,000 millirem = 1 rem)
Table 1. Threshold Effects
Dose (in rem) Effects
5 to 20 Possible latent effects (cancer), possible chromosomal abberations
25 to 100 Blood changes
More than 50 Temporary sterility in males
100 Double the normal incidents of genetic defects
100 to 200 Vomiting, diarrhea, reduction in infection resistance, possible bone growth retardation in children
200 to 300 Serious radiation sickness, nausea
More than 300 Permanent sterility in females
300 to 400 Bone marrow and intestine destruction
400 to 1000 Acute illness and early death (usually within days)
Non-threshold effects can occur at any level of radiation exposure, but the risk of harmful health effects generally increases with the amount of radiation absorbed. The most studied non-threshold effect is cancer. These studies are somewhat complicated by the facts that (1) not all cancers are caused by radiation, (2) exposure to a particular dose may cause cancer in one person but not another, and (3) the cancer often doesn’t appear until many years after the exposure to radiation. It is currently impossible to determine which cancers are caused by radiation and which are caused by other carcinogens in our environment.
Susceptibility to radiation-induced cancer depends on a number of factors such as the site of exposure in the body, sex, and age. Sites in the body where cells rapidly grow and multiply, and those where radioactive materials tend to concentrate, are more susceptible to cancer than others. For example, the breast and thyroid gland have relatively high susceptibilities to radiation-induced cancer, while the kidney and nerve cells have lower susceptibilities.
Many studies have been done on other possible effects of radiation on human health. The detail necessary to present accurate information on these studies is beyond the scope of this fact sheet. Health effects are thoroughly discussed in a book entitled Medical Effects of Ionizing Radiation by Fred A. Mettler, Jr., M.D. and Robert D. Moseley, Jr., M.D. This book is fairly technical, but it has an extensive glossary of terms and contains hundreds of references to studies done on the health effects of radiation.
Radiation Effects on Populations
Because it is impossible to predict the effect of low levels of radiation on any one person, studies of the human health effects of radiation are usually done by trying to predict how many people in a large population might be affected. The result of such a study is usually a prediction of how many people in a population of 100,000 or a million may get cancer due to a specific radiation exposure. The predicted cancers due to this specific radiation exposure are in addition to cancers that would normally be expected in the selected population.
The number of additional cancers expected in a population is calculated in two steps. First, the dose (in rems) to an average person in a population is multiplied by the number of persons in that population. The answer is given in person-rems. Then that answer is divided by the number of person-rems that produce one cancer in the population. The final result is the number of additional cancers expected.
Biological Effects
Mechanisms of Damage
Injury to living tissue results from the transfer of energy to atoms and molecules in the cellular structure. Ionizing radiation causes atoms and molecules to become ionized or excited. These excitations and ionizations can:
• Produce free radicals.
• Break chemical bonds.
• Produce new chemical bonds and cross-linkage between macromolecules.
• Damage molecules that regulate vital cell processes (e.g. DNA, RNA, proteins).
The cell can repair certain levels of cell damage. At low doses, such as that received every day from background radiation, cellular damage is rapidly repaired.
At higher levels, cell death results. At extremely high doses, cells cannot be replaced quickly enough, and tissues fail to function.
Chapter III
Conclusion
Exposure to ionizing radiation can come from many sources. You can learn when and where you may be exposed to sources of ionizing radiation in the exposure section below. One source of exposure is from hazardous waste sites that contain radioactive waste. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) identifies the most serious hazardous waste sites in the nation. These sites make up the National Priorities List (NPL) and are the sites targeted for federal cleanup. However, it’s unknown how many of the 1,467 current or former NPL sites have been evaluated for the presence of ionizing radiation sources. As more sites are evaluated, the sites with ionizing radiation may increase. This information is important because exposure to ionizing radiation may harm you and because these sites may be sources of exposure.
When a substance is released from a large area, such as an industrial plant, or from a container, such as a drum or bottle, it enters the environment. This release does not always lead to exposure. Even in the event that you are exposed, it does not necessarily mean you will be harmed or suffer long-term health effects from exposure to ionizing radiation.
If you are exposed to ionizing radiation, many factors determine whether you’ll be harmed. These factors include the dose (how much), the duration (how long), and the type of radiation. You must also consider the chemicals you’re exposed to and your age, sex, diet, family traits, lifestyle, and state of health.
Three basic concepts apply to all types of ionizing radiation. When we develop regulations or standards that limit how much radiation a person can receive in a particular situation, we consider how these concepts might affect a person’s exposure.
Time
The amount of radiation exposure increases and decreases with the time people spend near the source of radiation.
In general, we think of the exposure time as how long a person is near radioactive material. It’s easy to understand how to minimize the time for external (direct) exposure. Gamma and x-rays are the primary concern for external exposure.
However, if radioactive material gets inside your body, you can’t move away from it. You have to wait until it decays or until your body can eliminate it. When this happens, the biological half-life of the radionuclide controls the time of exposure. Biological half-life is the amount of time it takes the body to eliminate one half of the radionuclide initially present. Alpha and beta particles are the main concern for internal exposure.
Distance
The farther away people are from a radiation source, the less their exposure.
How close to a source of radiation can you be without getting a high exposure? It depends on the energy of the radiation and the size (or activity) of the source. Distance is a prime concern when dealing with gamma rays, because they can travel long distances. Alpha and beta particles don’t have enough energy to travel very far.
As a rule, if you double the distance, you reduce the exposure by a factor of four. Halving the distance, increases the exposure by a factor of four.
Why does exposure change more rapidly than the distance?
The area of the circle depends on the distance from the center to the edge of the circle (radius). It is proportional to the square of the radius. As a result, if the radius doubles, the area increases four times.
Think of the radiation source as a bare light bulb. The bulb gives off light equally in every direction, in a circle. The energy from the light is distributed evenly over the whole area of the circle. When the radius doubles, the radiation is spread out over four times as much area, so the dose is only one fourth as much. (In addition, as the distance from the source increases so does the likelihood that some gamma rays will lose their energy.
The exposure of an individual sitting 4 feet from a radiation source will be 1/4 the exposure of an individual sitting 2 feet from the same source
Shielding
The greater the shielding around a radiation source, the smaller the exposure.
Shielding simply means having something that will absorb radiation between you and the source of the radiation (but using another person to absorb the radiation doesn’t count as shielding). The amount of shielding required to protect against different kinds of radiation depends on how much energy they have.
(Alpha) A thin piece of light material, such as paper, or even the dead cells in the outer layer of human skin provides adequate shielding because alpha particles can’t penetrate it. However, living tissue inside body, offers no protection against inhaled or ingested alpha emitters.
(Beta) Additional covering, for example heavy clothing, is necessary to protect against beta-emitters. Some beta particles can penetrate and burn the skin.
(Gamma) Thick, dense shielding, such as lead, is necessary to protect against gamma rays. The higher the energy of the gamma ray, the thicker the lead must be. X-rays pose a similar challenge, so x-ray technicians often give patients receiving medical or dental X-rays a lead apron to cover other parts of their body.
At high radiation doses, significant effects can occur in exposed individuals within a short time of exposure, and in severe cases this can lead to early death. At low radiation doses, the principal concern is the risk of radiation-induced cancer in exposed individuals and hereditary disease in their descendants. The risks of these late effects have been quantified and this provides the basis for recommendations on limits for exposure.